Friday, May 16, 2008

Stories from the Stool: An Inside Look at the Life of a Field Usher

This past week I had the pleasure of interviewing Aaron Borchelt, a field usher for the St. Louis Cardinals at Busch Stadium. You can find him along the 1st base line, sitting on his stool with his helmet and glove, waiting for a foul ball to come near and some lucky fan to get it. But his job is much more than retrieving foul balls and giving them to fans; rather, Aaron brings a whole new perspective to what it's like to watch a ballgame at Busch. His experiences add to the diverse body of Cardinal Nation, and there's a chance he has been a part of your experience at the ballpark if you have sat along the 1st base line. I hope you enjoy this interview, and hopefully Aaron will be able to contribute from time to time here in the future.

For those not familiar with what you do, what is your job title and what are the basic duties of that position?

I am an usher for the St. Louis Cardinals. Basically, we are the ones that meet the fans as they enter the ballpark, provide direction to those that might be "misplaced", be a presence in each of the sections, provide a measure of security for all attendees, and strive to provide a fun, family-friendly environment by providing customer service. My gameday position is on the field down the right field line. It is a misconception that I am "better" or "more important" than the ushers in the seating area, but that is not true. I have just as much responsibility as they do. I am there to make sure that no one runs out onto the field or in any way interrupts the flow of the game. Part of that involves the catching of foul balls and tossing them to a lucky fan.

How long have you been working for the Cardinals?


I have been working for the Cardinals since I was 17. So, doing the math, I am now in my 10th season as an usher for the Birds.

I'm sure you have interacted with many fans, but what has been the most memorable interaction you have had with a fan?

The fans are the reason I, along with the other ushers, am there. It is hard to narrow down my interactions to just one memorable moment. Being in the same position every game allows me to create a friendship with the "regulars," those fortunate few that have season tickets. I regularly get emails from some of the ticketholders. I think other moments that stand out are when I can give a ball to a young fan and see their face light up. There was one such time this year that I gave the kid a baseball and he turned around and held it up in front of the entire section. Needless to say, baseball's best fans gave that little kid a standing ovation, as well as a memory he will not soon forget. It's the little things like that that make my job worthwhile. I know it sounds cliche, but it's true!

A while ago there was talk that the Cardinals are catering to a more well-to-do crowd at the ballgames. People are less apt to stand up and cheer, and the tone is more subdued, so they say. Since you're at all the home games, have you noticed any change in fan behavior over your ten years with the Cardinals?

That is quite an observation, or shall I say accusation. As it appears, the clientele has changed dramatically over the course of the past decade or so. It used to be a place where families could come for a night out, fathers could teach their kids how to keep score, people would do the wave, etc. Nowadays, you see more business suits, client meetings, and a more corporate look in the stands. It appears as though the focus of the fans is gone .... it's no longer a fun night out, but rather a status symbol as "I was at the game last night" or "I was in an all-inclusive party area entertaining a big client yesterday". I think part of this is due to the escalating prices of tickets and other inclusions to an experience at the ballpark. A family of four should expect to pay around $300-$400 in one night when you consider tickets, parking, food, souvenirs, gas, and everything else that goes along with a trip to Busch Stadium. Is this due to the magnitude of players' salaries? Perhaps. Is it due to the greed of ownership? Maybe. Whatever the reason is, one can certainly see a difference on a nightly basis. It's not necessarily a bad change, but it is noticeable.

We've occasionally seen field ushers make the Sportscenter clips with a great pick or an embarrassing dive and miss. Have you experienced any moments of glory and/or failure when going after a ball that you care to share with us? Have you encountered any great fan catch in the stands or along the line?

I have indeed made some catches, but nothing that would be Sportscenter-esque. I will say, though, that one of the more memorable moments involving a field usher was when a guy from the other side fielded a FAIR ball. Great play, clean hands, but FAIR!!! (Pardon me while I pick myself up off the floor from laughing) He fielded the ball, looked up, realized what he did, and then dropped it as if nothing happened. "NO, 40,000+ people and a regional television audience didn't just see you do that ...." HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA Needless to say, that was quite embarrassing for him, extremely hilarious for me and the other ushers, and a moment that will live in infamy for years to come. Follow-up question ... did he get fired? No ... he is still there.

Are there any extra perks to being an usher that go unnoticed by the ordinary fan?

Other than a paycheck twice a month, there aren't any "perks" that are notable. Yes, I get to meet the players .... that's pretty nice. I get to see every game, including the playoffs and World Series ... AWESOME! I can't get autographs (usually one of the first questions asked by fans).

You mention forming relationships with season ticket holders. Have you been able to interact with the players at all? Have you formed any relationships with them?

I do get to interact with the players briefly. I spent one year out in the visitors bullpen (they used to have ushers out there) so I got to know many of them. To this day, they still come by and see how I'm doing. As far as Cardinals go, I really got to know David Eckstein and Scott Rolen well over the past few seasons. I went up to Cleveland this past weekend to see them play. David was on the DL but Scotty was there. After BP, he came over to talk to me and signed whatever items I had for him. I was the only person he signed for which was rather special. All in all, the players know who I am and I know who they are, so the interaction is normally a "Hey how ya doing" or "Great game yesterday" type of convo.

That's interesting about your relationship with David Eckstein and Scott Rolen. I think the way Rolen left the Cardinals may have misconstrued his personality as one of being overly stubborn and maybe even bitter. But to see that he took the time to talk to you presents a completely different story than the one we grew used to. Any comments on the difference between the Rolen that refused to back down to La Russa and the Rolen that stopped by to say hello to you?

I think that the Scott Rolen that I saw (as well as the fans saw) was totally different than the Scott Rolen that was in the clubhouse. I have heard that there were some rather heated moments between those two behind closed doors in the confidentiality of the clubhouse. I cannot confirm or deny those types of moments as I did not see them. I would also protect the confidentiality had I seen them. It has been documented (and confirmed) that there were "differences in opinion" between LaRussa and Rolen. That's a known fact. I only know Scott Rolen in the times that I have interacted with him and those times were very pleasant, very sociable, and never awkward. Whether or not there was an incident in the clubhouse prior to seeing me, I would have never known it. He was always quite cordial and friendly.

Albert Pujols hits a home run and an excited fan decides to celebrate by running onto the field. What is the first thing you do?

First and foremost, we keep in mind the safety of the fan. Running onto the field during a game can be quite dangerous. (Heck, attending a game can be quite dangerous, but I digress) There are strong men swinging bats, throwing baseballs at very high speeds, and numerous other potential problems. While running on the field might seem appealing, it is really not safe, whether the game is in play or between innings. IF a person were to run on the field, our job (the field ushers) is to "catch" (for lack of a better term) the person and escort them off the field (to the hands of the police waiting for them) as quickly and orderly as possible. That being said, if someone is disorderly or not cooperative, special treatment can be administered, and I will keep it at that.

I said that our first priority is the safety of the fans. Our second is the safety of the players and coaches. Remember back to the incident in Chicago when the Royals first base coach got attacked by the fan? It is stories like that that really speaks volumes to me as an on-field employee. Or the time in Boston where Gary Sheffield of the Yankees almost got into a fist fight with a fan. Yes, the position has its perks and can be very fun, but it is also one of the places where you have to be the most alert and serious.

Here's the golden question: how do you determine who gets a foul ball when you give it to the fans?


Ahhhhh, the golden question. Well, there is really no rule as to who gets the foul balls, but I make it a personal policy to give it to kids. They are the future of the game. It's amazing how a scuffed up baseball can brighten their day. I've had kids come back and ask for my autograph before on the ball that I gave them. It just really makes their day. It becomes their next school show-and-tell object. I could give it to any hot-looking female and probably never see them again, or I could give it to a 30-something guy and see it on eBay the next day. (I know these are extremes) But the kids are the ones I target. Besides, it makes for better TV!!!! ;-) Now I will say that there is one exception to my policy. On Mother's Day, I make it a point to give the foul balls to the moms and grandmas in the stands. (Typical follow-up question: What about Father's Day? Who cares about them ... I give it to the kids) Moral of my story: NEVER FORGET YOUR MOTHER!!!!

It's interesting how you can be an integral part of some child's lasting memory of going to the ballgame by simply giving that child a foul ball. That would seem to make the job worthwhile just based on that fact...

Very satisfying to please a kid and be a part of their show-and-tell story. The kids are the future of this game. If a simple baseball can bring a kid back, or get them to watch games on TV, the sport will be around for generations to come. If they have a bad experience, parents might stop bringing their kids and then there might not be an interest in America's Pastime at all. I know that sounds extreme, but you never know. Baseball has to compete with basketball, football, hockey, and every other sport out there, most of which are fast-paced and high scoring. There aren't too many sports in which every 10-15 minutes or so you take a break, or the contest lasts 3+ hours, or there can be a delay of which a game might be canceled. I know you can point to hockey as being a potential evening of "boredom" with the possibility of a 1-0 score, but at least you have guys flying around on an ice surface and a lot of physical moments. You don't get that in baseball.

Aaron, thank you very much for your candid remarks over the course of this interview. I appreciate you taking the time to inform the fans about what life is like doing a job that most of us have never experienced. Being a field usher may seem simple, but it definitely has its complexities, which you have so aptly described. I feel assured knowing that we have an individual of such character and love of the game manning the right field line, giving baseballs to fans and protecting the players' security.

Bullpen Musings, Glaus Heats Up

What more can you say after a game like that? Jason Isringhausen is most likely headed somewhere - either the DL or Memphis - which would also mean Chris Perez is the probable call-up from Triple-A. Isringhausen doesn't sound too optimistic about anything right now, according to Joe Strauss:

"I'm out of answers. I'm out of excuses," Isringhausen said. "We've just got to go to the next step, whatever that might be. I don't have any answers. I expect probably an answer tomorrow when I get here. We'll go from there."

"I don't know what we're going to do," Isringhausen said. "I wish I could say I was hurt, my arm was falling off, or I couldn't land. I can't do that. People (hitters) standing at home plate tell you what the end result should be. I'm not getting any swings and misses, so that says something about my stuff. I feel healthy. But maybe my 'healthy' just isn't good enough."
I highly recommend this post from Future Redbirds to get more information on Chris Perez, who didn't pitch yesterday and is the likeliest of the Memphis bullpen to get the call. So far this year, Chris has lowered his walk rate while maintaining his propensity to strike hitters out. Compared to last year's stint in Memphis, Perez is much more polished:


GIPERAK%BB%BABIPFIP
20071514.04.5025.922.4.1606.22
20081817.22.0430.112.3.2753.27

Another interesting, though unrelated, observation regarding yesterday's game - Troy Glaus is heating up. Glaus, a notoriously streaky hitter, has increased his OBP to .379 and is walking at his best rate since 2000 with the Angels. Over the past 5 games, Glaus has hit a home run, collected 10 hits, 5 RBIs, and increased his OBP from .336 to .379. How long will this last? Well, Troy had a similar 5-game stretch from April 20-24, when he collected 9 hits, 5 RBIs, and increased his OBP from .329 to .372. He subsequently went hitless over his next two games and went back to hitting sporadically. May has been a better month to Glaus, so let's hope that keeps up and Glaus stays hot. We need it.

Thursday, May 15, 2008

I Don't Really Want to Type This

Cubs sign Edmonds.
























Sigh.

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Shaking it Up

First it's the offense, now it's the bullpen that's refusing to come through for us lately. Check that, offense is still anemic with runners on base as well. I have more confidence that our bullpen will pull though, but we really should assign a temporary closer spot to someone in the bullpen to give some stability to the back-end. Perhaps it's time to call Chris Perez up to the big leagues. A shake-up could be coming soon.

As for the offense, there are a few moves we should explore. Joe Mather, who's absolutely raking in Memphis, could easily replace Chris Duncan as an outfield platoon. He'll turn 26 in July and is hitting .321/.429/.617 in 81 AB, including 5 home runs and a healthy .296 isolated power. As for Duncan? I love the on-base skills and the potential power threat he has (that is, untapped potential at the moment), but his best attributes project as a good DH or first baseman. The DH's are seriously struggling in the American League this year, and a number of teams need a first baseman. The Blue Jays recently acquired Kevin Mench and Brad Wilkerson to help the outfield, and Duncan would be a sizable improvement over them. Of course, we all know of Anthony Reyes' availability. A package of both Anthony and Duncan could make it more appealing for a team to part with a "top prospect and another piece."

I thought I'd check-in with some possible targets we'll have on the trade market, as some have made some news:

  • Khalil Greene, shortstop for the Padres, hit his third home run of the season last night, bringing his line up to .214/.258/.331 in 145 AB. He is still hitting into some bad luck with a .257 BABIP, but he is hitting line drives at a healthy 21% clip. I think Greene should be one of our top targets if we're seeking to add another true power threat to the lineup. The Padres are 15-25 and in last place in the NL West, so there's a good likelihood they would listen to offers this season. Greene is due $6.5 million next year, the last year of his contract, and he plays very good defense. The OBP makes me gag, but I don't know if there's a whole lot of better options. This report card isn't pretty...
  • I must have missed this one when it first happened, but Sean Rodriguez, shortstop, has been recalled by the Angels to start for injured Chone Figgins. This will be interesting to watch as it'll be a bit of a showcase for the prospect in the big leagues. In 30 AB with the Angels, Rodriguez is batting .233/.324/.233 with 3 walks and 10 strikeouts, grounding out 63% of the time.
  • Brent Lillibridge still continues to struggle for the Triple-A Richmond Braves, batting .183/.236/.248 in 109 AB. Brian Barden seems like a better option at this point.
  • Ben Zobrist has finally started his 2008 campaign with the Tampa Bay Rays.
  • Would the Yankees care to trade a struggling arbitration-eligible player for another guy having a sub-par year? Robinson Cano is batting just .183/.237/.303 in 142 AB. Hank must be pretty mad by now.
Finally, I'd like to give a shout-out to the good folks at Maritz, who (according to my source) make this a daily read. Thanks for reading and feel free to add to the discussion!

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

The Economics of Rasmus

The Baseball Economist, JC Bradbury, had an interesting blog post last month that relates to what the Cardinals have been trying to do lately with contract negotiations. JC talks about the Tampa Bay Rays' deal with star prospect and now major leaguer Evan Longoria, which was offered to him just a few at-bats into his first major league season. The deal is worth $17.5 million over six years, including team options for three more years. The first option would pay $7.5 million in the seventh year of the contract and the second option covers both the eighth and ninth season for $11 and $11.5 million, respectively.

JC acknowledges that the deal works both ways - the Rays primarily get the options but also buy-out the arbitration-eligible years Evan would have merited, and Evan gets financial stability for the rest of his life, even if he never pans out as a major league player. The deal would seem to be a no-brainer for Longoria, who had a sub-par year with the Rays Triple-A affiliate (hmm... sound familiar?) and now can earn a substantial amount of money in his first years that typically would be worth less than $500,000. What does the Baseball Economist have to say of the deal?

By taking advantage of players’ risk aversion, teams can sign several players for less than their expected value and come out ahead in the long run. For example, assume we have two players who are expected to be worth $10 million/year for five years (total salaries of $100 million). Let’s say that one player ends up being worth $5 million/year, while the other is worth $15 million/year, the team still ends up getting $100 million in value. However, this is not where the big savings come in. Had the team gone year-to-year with the players, paying each of them their exact annual worth, the team does not save any money. Because players are willing to trade income for financial security, teams can sign players for less than their expected value. Therefore, the team in our example ought to be able to sign the players for less than $10 million per year each.
By signing Longoria to a deal now, the Rays can take advantage of club options that will likely be less than Evan's true value seven years from now. Considering Ryan Howard's big arbitration victory in his first year of eligibility ($10 million), the Rays may have avoided paying a higher salary on a year-by-year basis for Evan. Of course, there's risk involved signing a player so early, but, as JC explains, you prepare for it by evaluating the player's potential and diversifying your roster with contracts. Based on Longoria's highly-touted prospect status, I don't think the Rays expect Evan to tank any time soon.

What does this have to do with the Cardinals? The Cards have been proactive lately in signing their young players to avoid arbitration. Adam Wainwright's last arbitration-ineligible year was bought out this year with a $15 million deal for four years, including options for two more years. Yadier Molina sold his arbitration-eligible years for a 4-year, $15.5 million contract with a $7 million club option in the fifth year.

It's not out of the question to approach Colby Rasmus, our own star prospect, with the same type of deal the Rays gave to Evan Longoria. We know he'll be at least a passable major league player, with a high likelihood to play at an above-average level. The Cardinals need to look at a possible deal in light of what Ryan Howard got in arbitration and how much Colby could possibly ask for in a contract after his third year in the majors, when he would become arbitration-eligible. Interestingly, the Indians took the Longoria route with the player Colby is often compared to - Grady Sizemore - by signing him to a 6-year, $23.45 million contract after Grady's first year in the majors, with a club option for the seventh year.

There was some complaining from Cardinal Nation when the Cards signed Adam Wainwright to his four-year deal, but this is a strategy that could pay off on a long-term scale. Signing Colby Rasmus in his first year could actually be very cost-effective, and signing him after his first year would alleviate some risk but also drive up the price a little as the discrepancy between Sizemore and Longoria's contract shows. The Cardinals have not had a prospect as highly touted as Colby Rasmus come through the pipeline in quite some time, so this is a uncharted water, especially with John Mozeliak at the helm. Assuming Colby breaks free of his slump and retains his top-prospect status, taking a long-term approach to his contract would assure Colby's presence with the Cards for quite a while, give him financial stability, and save us money. Everybody wins.

By the way, I highly recommend The Baseball Economist by JC Bradbury. Makes for a great and interesting read!

Monday, May 12, 2008

Looking for a New Address

Yesterday, an important story by Joe Strauss came out from the Post-Dispatch that all but assures us that Anthony Reyes will not be with the Cardinals at the end of this year. Some excerpts:

Manager Tony La Russa explained a bullpen crisis necessitated the May 4 move, which swapped Reyes for Mike Parisi. True, Reyes would not have been available to pitch behind starter Joel Pineiro if Pineiro experienced a recurrence of back spasms Monday night in Colorado. However, the larger truth is that Parisi proved more impressive to pitching coach Dave Duncan in spring training...

Reyes' availability for trade ranks as one of the game's worst-kept secrets, though Mozeliak insists he remains "hesitant" to finalize a deal given the rotation's uncertain depth as Mark Mulder and Matt Clement rehabilitate from shoulder surgeries.

Other clubs believe the point moot for now, since Mozeliak's asking price of at least one top prospect does not square with Reyes' value to the other 29 organizations.

"We have no interest in giving Anthony Reyes away," Mozeliak insisted...
The fact that Mike Parisi is thought of as a better option in the bullpen than Reyes, even though both are capable of going 3+ innings on the spot, demonstrates the lack of confidence the club has in Anthony. I don't think that will ever change, given Parisi's success in his role and the number of ready bullpen and rotation pitchers in Memphis right now - Chris Perez, Jason Motte, Ron Flores, Jaime Garcia, and P.J. Walters.

Now, all we can hope for is for Anthony to excel in Memphis, as he has always done. Friday in Las Vegas was a decent start, with Reyes going 3 innings, 4 hits, 3 K, 3 BB, and no earned runs. It becomes a game of "who matches up?" at this point. The Rockies are still looking for rotation and bullpen help, as are the Braves.

I wouldn't mind packaging him with Chris Duncan, who has proved to be the least valuable outfielder on this team so far. Not only is he a defensive liability, but he isn't producing the power at the plate that makes him valuable. His isolated power is at a career-low .145, and he has only 3 dingers on the year. Against lefthanded pitchers he's batting .083/.154/.083 (1 hit in 12 AB), and .296/.427/.465 in 71 AB against righthanders, essentially making him a righthanded pitcher specialist (meaning he needs to stay on the bench). He's on pace for only 14 home runs and 44 RBI's on the year.

Contrast that with Ryan Ludwick, who's batting .400/.438/.767 in 60 AB against righthanded pitchers and .268/.367/.683 against lefties. Ryan Ludwick, though he bats righthanded, is much more effective at doing what Duncan is supposed to do. In addition, Ludwick has actually displayed power and is a natural outfielder, capable of playing all three positions. He's on pace to hit 39 dingers and 117 RBIs over the course of the year.

There is no reason why Duncan should be starting for any reason other than to rest the outfield, especially considering that Rick Ankiel is batting .306/.375/.556 with 2 home runs in 36 AB this year against lefties and .280/.385/.462 with 4 home runs in 93 AB against righties (By the way, Rick is batting .301/.351/.563 in 103 AB against lefties in his career).

If we could only find a taker for 'lil Dunc. Until then, keep him out of the lineup.